Success Happy

Has any presidential candidate been as successful as Romney in the public and private sectors?

yb4..put down the crack pipe! ditto rr!!!!!!!!! dj sure you did...

Public Comments

1. Almost all of them have been MORE successful across the board.
2. Yes, the Clinton's, but theirs were all underhanded.
3. Romney was a great success at shipping American jobs overseas. What a traitor.
4. Clinton? One shot at public office...not even representing her home state??? What's up with that? And, Obama is wet behind the ears, so to speak!
5. He was born into wealth and he's made his political career on lies, lies and more lies. Not my idea of success.
6. Successful in what way??? He has been very successful in ignoring the poor and neglected members of our society. He has been very successful in lying and fooling lots of people that he cares. He does not give a damn about anything but keeping big business happy!
7. sorry buddy a guy who came up acting like gordon gecko from the movie wall street is not the guy I want in the white house
8. Yes----Ross Perot both in business-- and respect and work for veterans----he funded a rescue effort for Iranian hostages also. In my opinion he would have been or would be a 2 to 1 better president than would Romney be.
9. There have been other candidates with great success in business. Ross Perot was one. But honestly, the presidency is not exactly like running an a major office supply store chain. There are a lot less voters to please in business for one, and the only goal is to make money for the investors. The goal of the presidency is multifaceted. It should protect the country and the constitution while embracing democracy. Certainly fiscal expertise is a great quality. There are many other facets to choosing a candidate. If you are considering a republican, Guilianni is strong legally and really knows the constitution. Hucakabee is a moral conservative with a track record too... McCain seems to know what it takes to get things done on Capital hill; which is a tall order! Bush failed on the SS piece and the port security piece. On the other side of the fence I don't see any expertise in foreign policy, financial talent or talent in making things happen in Washington. The dems have yet to effect anything they promised in the senate elections. And of course, it's some else's fault. Change in Washington requires getting others to go along with you and gathering support for that. Thanks for voting!
10. If you gage one's success by how much money they put in their own pocket without regard to who's pocket it came out of then he is as you say a success . If you measure success by how many people you provided secure employment and benefits for then he is an utter and complete failure .