Success Happy

"Power" - Be it political, economic or scientific - increases the potential for har?

An extreme example is confirmed on March 30, 2010, when the European Organization for Nuclear Energy says it has managed to recreate the first time, the conditions of the universe backwards in time until only a billionth of a second after the Big Bang false (the blast) who assume that the cosmos originated. In the control room of the European Organization for Nuclear Research (Cem), scientists made a standing ovation and opened the champagne bottles, while proving screens turns the beams of protons at the LHC gave every second during the collisions that have cost U.S. $ 9.4 Billion. "You realize the polarization of this decision making: choose the solution that most often is the least intelligent." This science full of heroes transformed results from two failures in comedies fun to recreate what has always existed (Universe) as describe in this circle that repeats the genetics of life on earth: be they human, animal or plant. This is all part of the cycle of chemical, which is linked to the environment: fauna, flora and microorganisms that are the geological factors of balance, atmospheric, meteorological and biological, materials and energies of the earth's ecosystem - because one can verify this empirically revered with proof of this diagram: Sol (+)> <((-) Earth (+))> <(-) Interstellar System, in addition to math says this: a neutral force between two opposing forces at different temperatures, have different kinetic energies, capable of responding infinitely by macro universe, finite and infinite in size in his time. But there is an antidote to them, prove their experience in converting all existing atomic waste - in a body the size of a pinhead, as scientists say about the theory before the Big Bang. Subject that most people no longer insist on ignoring about the great progress of physics in favor of nature. Do you agree with Tarcisio Brito? Or would you rather take what Einstein said there is little or nothing to do when the spirit of silliness is incorporated in an individual or in mass society. Brazilian Answers: Hello! The Big Bang is a ridiculous argument created with inspiration and Hollywood style fostered by the desire for novelty, a time when the great discoveries of man had already been exhausted. The electricity and the steam engine were the greater works Humanities. It emerged around the progress and seeking comfort. Later, information technology has opened doors in every direction, enabling advances in medicine and in scientific development. But the failure that results from the Man in Space (because that is not their environment), open cracks in Science that leave the physicists and astronomers powerless and ashamed (wrongly). Then begin to posit things like Black Holes, Big Bangs, dark matter, traveling at the speed of light, etc.. Suddenly, the whole community interested to see expectant and eager for news. The Big Bang is accepted by many, without any foundation or hypothesis of calculation. In this regard, all numbers are large. Large enough to fit in Large enough to fit in them the necessary margin of error of the speculator. It is also immaterial because there is or there is no Big Bang, are two related truths. And, moreover, Relativity was another good loophole to find success in the study, even without merit. And if everything is more or less relative, nor is it easy to distinguish between a great truth or a lie. CERN. demand much more than dark matter or the Higgs boson, (another fraud), some hypothetical cost-effective energy source to continue to feed the machine of corruption worldwide. One day the man learned to bombard plutonium and then extract large amounts of energy (not matter what the consequences ...). Unleashed to build thermonuclear power to better monetize the electricity market. And today, in the middle sec. XXI, there are still those who think that electricity is then generated by processes that are related to the atoms of plutonium, when, after all, the atomic reaction only serves to heat the water that set in motion a large steam engine equal to the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. The Plutonium replaced "only" coal. Likewise, the engines of modern cars, have sophisticated means of managing the supply of fuel through the ECU, to regulate the mixture to be burned. This provides better efficiency, compared to older engines. But the heart of the machine, where it generates force, is a cylinder block that explode and do turn a crankshaft, as in Ford T, 19 ... and gorse. Electric cars are new and, probably, a medium-term solution. But today's electric motors are machines that work by innovative processes?? Nothing, they are exactly the same engine to the first electric motor. A large magnet fixed (stator) and an electromagnetic rotor that spins when powered by battery. The electronic technology is watching all this and only assumes a secondary role and shaky accelerator. All to say the man is arrested, even here in the Universe of Big Bangs and Black Holes, to a smaller universe, which is our smallness. Hugs.

Public Comments

1. Necessity is mother of invention,our body,wisdom,art,technology,are the continues improvement of our life style,human is a logic machine so it governing earth.Moreover curio city is one of the best feature for new progress and comfort.Each experiment is expensive,future welfare and development.Generally good and bad things are always there.When good is more then called welfare and when bad is more then disaster is there.We should not afraid of this otherwise development is not possible.
2. Umm, is this a question of a rant? Anyway, there is so much to say here, but I will take out only a few plums. > collisions that have cost U.S. $ 9.4 Billion. This money is hardly lost. Fundamental research needs technology at the border of what is feasible and often leads to gadgets that can be developed for commercial use. Take a look at you US key: that way of storing information came directly out of fundamental research. Think about that the next time you surf the web: the WWW was invented at CERN to store the millions of specs and drawings needed to build the LHC. > "You realize the polarization of this decision making: choose the solution that most often is the least intelligent." Don't confuse science with politics, it's insulting. > Sol (+)> <((-) Earth (+))> <(-) Interstellar System, Very amusing that you use a particle physics notation to support your argument. > The Big Bang is a ridiculous argument created Hardly, the amount of evidence in support of the Big Bang theory is simply overwhelming. So much so that the theory simply cannot now be overturned. > The electricity and the steam engine were the greater works Humanities. The steam engine? It wasn't a steam rocket that brought Neil Armstrong to the Moon. And what about medical advances? > Man in Space (because that is not their environment), Why not? Earth is only a tiny speck in the Universe. Aren't we allowed to see the other 99.9999....99% ? > The Big Bang is accepted by many, without any foundation or hypothesis of calculation. You're about 100 years behind on reading articles about the Universe. > nor is it easy to distinguish between a great truth or a lie. Well, actually in science it is. If a theory doesn't predict the observed experimental results, out it goes! > the Higgs boson, (another fraud), Nope, more like a working hypothesis. If it isn't there we have to invent another solution to the problem of why particles have mass. > The Plutonium replaced "only" coal. Actually it's uranium, but you're right on the basics. Except for the fact that technological progress gave use trains that drive at 500 km/hr a far cry from steam locs. > All to say the man is arrested, Let's talk about this again in 100 years. I'll bet you we'll have a colony on Mars by then. (And if not us, the Chinese will.)